Skip to content

Remove non-existent --eval-provider and --eval-base-url from generate docs#17

Merged
evalstate merged 1 commit intohuggingface:mainfrom
hardikmer:fix/remove-nonexistent-generate-options
Feb 9, 2026
Merged

Remove non-existent --eval-provider and --eval-base-url from generate docs#17
evalstate merged 1 commit intohuggingface:mainfrom
hardikmer:fix/remove-nonexistent-generate-options

Conversation

@hardikmer
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Fixes documentation that references options that no longer exist in the generate command.

The --eval-provider and --eval-base-url options were removed from the generate command in commit 542b3af, but the documentation was not updated.

Problem

Users following the documentation get errors:

Error: No such option: --eval-base-url Did you mean --eval-model?
Error: No such option: --eval-provider Did you mean --eval-model?

Changes

  • Remove --eval-provider and --eval-base-url from README options list
  • Update example to use --no-eval instead of non-existent options
  • Fix CLI help docstring to match actual available options

Verification

  • upskill generate --help now shows only valid options
  • All examples use options that actually exist
  • Tests pass
  • Linting passes

Note: For local model evaluation, users can use upskill eval with --base-url after generating with --no-eval.

… docs

These options were removed from the generate command but the
documentation still referenced them, causing user errors.

Changes:
- Remove --eval-provider and --eval-base-url from README options list
- Update example to use --no-eval instead of non-existent options
- Fix CLI help docstring to match actual available options
@evalstate evalstate merged commit 8b95fc9 into huggingface:main Feb 9, 2026
2 checks passed
@evalstate
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for catching this!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants